The main
issue that the New Program Protocol addresses is the number of different
committees working simultaneously on the evaluation of a proposal—often with
different evaluation standards in mind. The New Program Protocol eliminates
much of the cross-purpose confusion and clarifies the proper approval path of
new recommendations.
The
flowchart located below indicates the streamlined changes to the evaluation process.
A “proposal”
can include ideas for a Degree Program, a Certificate Program, or a Non-Degree
Program (e.g., professional development or some form of a continuing education
curriculum). This process would also be followed for changes to existing
programs, i.e., changing a program from low residency to online.
The chart
below illustrates how a new idea needs a sponsor from an academic program—a
dean in this case where the program involves academic credit. Once a sponsor
for a new program idea has been found, the originator must create a preliminary
two-page abstract with appendices as needed.
The
originator then submits the abstract to the Vice President of Academic Affairs
for a provisional approval.
Once the VPAA
has approved it, the originator prepares a full, detailed proposal with necessary
projection information and impact predictions.
Only after
that full proposal has been drafted and initially approved by the VPAA do the
appropriate committees begin evaluating the proposal: department-level
committees, the BS ARC, the BA EIC, or the Graduate Review Committee. Once the
committee approves a proposal, they recommend the proposal back to the VPAA who
consults with the deans to ensure that no more information is necessary.
If the
proposal is satisfactory, the VPAA presents the proposal to the President, to
the trustees, and to any external agencies as necessary, e.g., the Ohio Board
of Regents, the Higher Learning Commission, etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment